A Threatened Nation Can React

Norms Appearing In The Form Of Law Entitle Actors To Exercise Their Rights Or Liberties. However, One Cannot Determine Which Of These Laws Are Legitimate Simply By Looking At The Form Of Individual Rights. Only By Bringing In The Discourse Principle Can One Show That Each Person Is Owed A Right To The Greatest Possible Measure Of Equal Liberties That Are Mutually Compatible.

If The September 11 Terror Attack Is Supposed To Constitute A Caesura In World History, It Must Be Able To Stand Comparison To Other Events Of World Historical Impact.

Positivism Stands Or Falls With The Principle Of Scientism, That Is That The Meaning Of Knowledge Is Defined By What The Sciences Do And Can Thus Be Adequately Explicated Through The Methodological Analysis Of Scientific Procedures.

The Difference Between Political Terror And Ordinary Crime Becomes Clear During The Change Of Regimes, In Which Former Terrorists Become Well-regarded Representatives Of Their Country.

I Would In Fact Tend To Have More Confidence In The Outcome Of A Democratic Decision If There Was A Minority That Voted Against It, Than If It Was Unanimous... Social Psychology Has Amply Shown The Strength Of This Bandwagon Effect.