I Find The Idea Of

In The Abstract, It Might Be Tempting To Imagine That Irreducible Complexity Simply Requires Multiple Simultaneous Mutations - That Evolution Might Be Far Chancier Than We Thought, But Still Possible. Such An Appeal To Brute Luck Can Never Be Refuted... Luck Is Metaphysical Speculation; Scientific Explanations Invoke Causes.

Throughout History There Have Been Many Other Examples, Similar To That Of Haeckel, Huxley And The Cell, Where A Key Piece Of A Particular Scientific Puzzle Was Beyond The Understanding Of The Age.

Despite Some Remaining Puzzles, There's No Reason To Doubt That Darwin Had This Point Right, That All Creatures On Earth Are Biological Relatives

There Is No Publication In The Scientific Literature - In Prestigious Journals, Specialty Journals, Or Books - That Describes How Molecular Evolution Of Any Real, Complex Biochemical System Either Did Occur Or Even Might Have Occurred.

A Man From A Primitive Culture Who Sees An Automobile Might Guess That It Was Powered By The Wind Or By An Antelope Hidden Under The Car, But When He Opens Up The Hood And Sees The Engine He Immediately Realizes That It Was Designed.