In Fact, A Sense Of

The Key Question Is, No Matter How Much You Absorb Of Another Person, Can You Have Absorbed So Much Of Them That When That Primary Brain Perishes, You Can Feel That That Person Did Not Totally Perish From The Earth... Because They Live On In A 'second Neural Home'?... In The Wake Of A Human Being's Death, What Survives Is A Set Of Afterglows, Some Brighter And Some Dimmer, In The Collective Brains Of Those Who Were Dearest To Them... Though The Primary Brain Has Been Eclipsed, There Is, In Those Who Remain... A Collective Corona That Still Glows.

You Can Never Represent Yourself Totally .... To Seek Self -knowledge Is To Embark On A Journey Which ... Will Always Be Incomplete, Cannot Be Charted On A Map, Will Never Halt, Cannot Be Described.

The Paraphrase Of Gödel's Theorem Says That For Any Record Player, There Are Records Which It Cannot Play Because They Will Cause Its Indirect Self-destruction.

I Would Proclaim That The Vast Majority Of What [say, Scientific American] Is True-yet My Ability To Defend Such A Claim Is Weaker Than I Would Like. And Most Likely The Readers, Authors, And Editors Of That Magazine Would Be Equally Hard Pressed To Come Up With Cogent, Non-technical Arguments Convincing A Skeptic Of This Point, Especially If Pitted Against A Clever Lawyer Arguing The Contrary. How Come Truth Is Such A Slippery Beast?

This Idea That There Is Generality In The Specific Is Of Far-reaching Importance.