In My Own Case, The

We Are Faced With The Task Of Convincing A Myth Infatuated World That Love And Curiosity Are Sufficient And You Don't Have To Delude Yourself And Frighten Yourself With Iron Age Fairy Tales. This Is A Monumental Task. I Don't Think There Is An Intellectual Struggle More Worthy Of Our Efforts.

Most People Believe That The Creator Of The Universe Wrote (or Dictated) One Of Their Books. Unfortunately, There Are Many Books That Pretend To Divine Authorship, And Each Makes Incompatible Claims About How We All Must Live.

If Someone Doesn’t Value Evidence, What Evidence Are You Going To Provide That Proves They Should Value Evidence. If Someone Doesn’t Value Logic, What Logical Argument Would You Invoke To Prove They Should Value Logic?

Science Does Not Limit Itself Merely To What Is Currently Verifiable. But It Is Interested In Questions That Are Potentially Verifiable (or, Rather, Falsifiable).

The Core Of Science Is Not A Mathematical Modeling--it Is Intellectual Honesty. It Is A Willingness To Have Our Certainties About The World Constrained By Good Evidence And Good Argument.