My Beautiful Proof Lies All

The Transfinite Numbers Are In A Certain Sense Themselves New Irrationalities And In Fact In My Opinion The Best Method Of Defining The Finite Irrational Numbers Is Wholly Disimilar To, And I Might Even Say In Priciple The Same As, My Method Described Above Of Introducing Trasfinite Numbers. One Can Say Unconditionally: The Transfinite Numbers Stand Or Fall With The Finite Irrational Numbers; They Are Like Each Other In Their Innermost Being; For The Former Like The Latter Are Definite Delimited Forms Or Modifications Of The Actual Infinite.

A Set Is A Many That Allows Itself To Be Thought Of As A One.

In Mathematics, The Art Of Asking Questions Is More Valuable Than Solving Problems.

Mathematics, In The Development Of Its Ideas, Has Only To Take Account Of The Immanent Reality Of Its Concepts And Has Absolutely No Obligation To Examine Their Transient Reality.

The Old And Oft-repeated Proposition "totum Est Majus Sua Parte" [the Whole Is Larger Than The Part] May Be Applied Without Proof Only In The Case Of Entities That Are Based Upon Whole And Part; Then And Only Then Is It An Undeniable Consequence Of The Concepts "totum" And "pars". Unfortunately, However, This "axiom" Is Used Innumerably Often Without Any Basis And In Neglect Of The Necessary Distinction Between "reality" And "quantity", On The One Hand, And "number" And "set", On The Other, Precisely In The Sense In Which It Is Generally False.