Obviously A Drawing Of A

One Usually Understands The Art Of The Past By Applying The Conventions Of The Present Thus Misunderstanding The Art Of The Past.

The System Is The Work Of Art; The Visual Work Of Art Is The Proof Of The System. The Visual Aspect Can't Be Understood Without Understanding The System. It Isn't What It Looks Like But What It Is That Is Of Basic Importance.

What The Work Of Art Looks Like Isn't Too Important.

Also, Since Art Is A Vehicle For The Transmission Of Ideas Through Form, The Reproduction Of The Form Only Reinforces The Concept. It Is The Idea That Is Being Reproduced. Anyone Who Understands The Work Of Art Owns It. We All Own The Mona Lisa.

[the Artist's Aim Is] Not To Instruct The Viewer, But To Give Him Information... . The Artist Would Follow His Predetermined Premise To Its Conclusion, Avoiding Subjectivity. Chance, Taste, Or Unconsciously Remembered Forms Would Play No Part In The Outcome. The Serial Artist Does Not Attempt To Produce A Beautiful Or Mysterious Object But Functions Merely As A Clerk Cataloguing The Results Of His Premise.