One Can Be Sophisticated And

It Would Also Be Strange To Find In The Midst Of A Catalog Of The Rights Of Individuals A Provision Securing To The States The Right To Maintain A Designated "militia." Dispassionate Scholarship Suggests Quite Strongly That The Right Of The People To Keep And Bear Arms Meant Just That.

Perhaps Sensing The Dismal Failure Of Its Efforts To Show That 'established By The State' Means 'established By The State Or The Federal Government,' The Court Tries To Palm Off The Pertinent Statutory Phrase As "inartful Drafting.' This Court, However, Has No Free-floating Power 'to Rescue Congress From Its Drafting Errors.'

Why In The World Would You Have It Interpreted By Nine Lawyers?

[t]he Enshrinement Of Constitutional Rights Necessarily Takes Certain Policy Choices Off The Table.... Undoubtedly Some Think That The Second Amendment Is Outmoded In A Society Where Our Standing Army Is The Pride Of Our Nation, Where Well-trained Police Forces Provide Personal Security, And Where Gun Violence Is A Serious Problem. That Is Perhaps Debatable, But What Is Not Debatable Is That It Is Not The Role Of This Court To Pronounce The Second Amendment Extinct.

If We Cannot Have Moral Feelings Against Homosexuality, Can We Have It Against Murder? Can We Have It Against Other Things?