What Is The Pattern That

Language Commonly Stresses Only One Side Of Any Interaction.

We Do Not Know Enough About How The Present Will Lead Into The Future. We Shall Never Be Able To Say, "ha! My Perception, My Accounting For That Series, Will Indeed Cover Its Next And Future Components," Or "next Time I Meet With These Phenomena, I Shall Be Able To Predict Their Total Course."

No Organism Can Afford To Be Conscious Of Matters With Which It Could Deal At Unconscious Levels. Broadly, We Can Afford To Sink Those Sorts Of Knowledge Which Continue To Be True Regardless Of Changes In The Environment, But We Must Maintain In An Accessible Place All Those Controls Of Behavior Which Must Be Modified For Every Instance. The Economics Of The System, In Fact, Pushes Organisms Toward Sinking Into The Unconscious Those Generalities Of Relationship Which Remain Permanently True And Toward Keeping Within The Conscious The Pragmatic Of Particular Instances.

But Epistemology Is Always And Inevitably Personal. The Point Of The Probe Is Always In The Heart Of The Explorer: What Is My Answer To The Question Of The Nature Of Knowing?

Perhaps There Is No Such Thing As Unilateral Power. After All, The Man In Power Depends On Receiving Information All The Time From Outside. He Responds To That Information Just As Much As He Causes Things To Happen... It Is An Interaction, And Not A Lineal Situation.