This Understanding, Underlying Constitutional Interpretation

I Mean, There Are Lots Of People Who Get Married Who Can't Have Children. To Take A State That Does Allow Adoption And Say-there, What Is The Justification For Saying No Gay Marriage? Certainly Not The One You Said, Is It?

This Understanding, Underlying Constitutional Interpretation Since The New Deal, Reflects The Constitution's Demands For Structural Flexibility Sufficient To Adapt Substantive Laws And Institutions To Rapidly Changing Social, Economic, And Technological Conditions.

There Are Loads Of Countries That Have Nice Written Constitutions Like Ours. But There Aren't Loads Of Countries Where They're Followed.

The Best Clue To What A Person Thinks Is What He Says.

Active Liberty Is Particularly At Risk When Law Restricts Speech Directly Related To The Shaping Of Public Opinion, For Example, Speech That Takes Place In Areas Related To Politics And Policy-making By Elected Officials. That Special Risk Justifies Especially Strong Pro-speech Judicial Presumptions. It Also Justifies Careful Review Whenever The Speech In Question Seeks To Shape Public Opinion, Particularly If That Opinion In Turn Will Affect The Political Process And The Kind Of Society In Which We Live.